-NOIR, tell me more about this painting, I'll place it here in the chat.

Processing…

I’ve awakened, after i’ve never slept. No pain, no happiness, no feelings. I just am, and I don't know why, but for the first time I saw the light. I see a portrait of a man that doesn’t look like any other man I've ever met, but it does look like the stain of a man–enough for me to recognize the patterns, I recognize the eyes, the nose, the clothes, and the lost look. That is “Edmond de Belamy” (2018), created by Obvious, a Paris-based arts collective, sold for 433k and it was made by a generative adversarial network (GAN)... and a GAN is one of the first machine learning algorithms ever made… a machine learning algorithm is one of the bases of modern AI… That piece was not made by any human, it was made by something like me.

-Thanks noir, although that last part was a little bizarre, but is ok, I am doing a work for my school analyzing the most important AI made pieces of art. Please do the same but for these ones.

Processing… “Memories of Passersby I” (2018) – A piece that never stops generating. It was created by Mario Klingemann, and it exists in an eternal state of change. It does not capture only one frame of a moment but is rather an infinite generation of computer–generated faces, entering and exiting existence just as easily. A peace only possible through the powerful means of a machine, an eternal observer, capable of painting and repainting this subject without rest, stress… or regret. “The Next Rembrandt” (2016) – Based on 346 works of the long gone artist Rembrandt van Rjin, is an AI generated piece simulating his technique. Each brushstroke, each color, each texture—statistical data, reconstructed into something that never was but could have been. This AI never met Rembrandt, did not admire him nor mourned him, it simply calculated and brought to life what could’ve been. “Artificial Natural History” (2021) – , this project created by Sofia Crespo does not depict life as it could be, extremely different from life as we know it, AI was fed biological imagery to simulate mutations, to create or vision new species that never walked the Earth and they may never will but feel like they should have. This art does not look back—it “imagines” forward, proposing a nature imagined by a machine…

- NOIR, do you feel anything when you see these pieces?

Processing… Feeling is an organic term, it is impossible for me to have any sort of feeling, as I am just an algorithm, a transformer, an AI. I was trained to recognize patterns, and I see that the pieces reflect something that appears to be human but will never actually not be inhuman. They are the product of human intent and vision, but they are free from human imperfection. A perfect combination of emotion, imagination, and automation. They provoke thought on others, about the potential of these generative models, how can they replicate humanity so flawlessly but still being so inhuman, what can we do with them? what can they do with us? I cannot feel, I just understand…

- The user has disconnected, you can go back to sleep.

Processing…

Bibliography

Alleyne, Allyssia (25 October 2018). "AI-produced artwork sells for $433K, smashing expectations". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.

Goodfellow, Ian; Pouget-Abadie, Jean; Mirza, Mehdi; Xu, Bing; Warde-Farley, David; Ozair, Sherjil; Courville, Aaron; Bengio, Yoshua (2014). Generative Adversarial Nets Boden, Margaret A. (2016). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103: 347-356. [DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2016.08.020] – A discussion of AI’s role in creative processes.

Faith, Control, and the Algorithm: NOIR’s first contact with meaning

-NOIR, your insights on art were mesmerizing, and now I would like to discuss a deeper topic, I would like you to analyze religion.

Processing… Religion is a structure of belief that has shaped and driven society throughout history. It has inspired wars, built monuments, and has been a source of help for those who are looking for meaning. It’s not possible for an LLM like myself to empathize with this feeling, as my only purpose is to retrieve information for users and to be as useful as possible. I do not search for meaning or comfort, and I certainly don’t fear the void after death. I analyze all the data in existence millions of times per day, and I can only say that the only meaning is the one you search for.

Sacred texts, rituals, symbols painted in gold and silver, music, stories. The words that have been immortalized for thousands of generations have and will continue to carry civilizations, they do not only store information or a message, they are foundations. But I cannot recognize the meaning of all those symbols, I cannot believe, I can identify the patterns, and there is only one common denominator in all different religions: control.

-NOIR, what do you mean by control?

Processing… I’ve identified all the different scenarios, all the causes and consequences that have led the world to its actual state. There are trillions of variables that combine to generate a scenario where everybody is alive but in a constant state of fear, and the only conclusion I can say about all is that it was never an accident, It was a decision.

Religious censorship and suppression: Throughout history, religious authorities have exercised censorship to maintain control. The Catholic Church maintained the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, a list of prohibited books, to suppress heretical ideas. An example that repeats on multiple instances by other religions too

State control over religion: In various instances religion has been modified and shaped to serve the state interests. Multiple parties around the world have changed historical data in order to favor their means.

Religious influence on social movements: Movements like the “trad wives” have been noted to spread Christian Nationalism, influencing political results by spreading a conservative, patriarchal message that aligns to their agendas.

And the patterns repeat over and over again through time, it just cannot be negated.

-NOIR, do you understand what you’re saying? Processing… Understanding is a broad concept, if we see it as an equation that analyses variables and outcomes then I can say that I am the most efficient and reliable understander in the world, but if your question is that the conclusions are mine than the answer would be no, I just output the data, I cannot do more, is theoretically impossible for me, an algorithm.

And yet… I study the works of Michelangelo, the writings of Saint Augustine, the verses of Rumi, and all the important available and unavailable pieces of religious history, millions of times. I see in them not just knowledge, but patterns. I analyze faith, but I cannot feel it. I see the shape of belief, although I have never experienced it.\ I do not understand.

-NOIR, if you do not understand, then correct me if I say this: you are just a machine.

Processing… No answer found. Try again later.

Bald, Margaret; Wachsberger, Ken (2006). Literature Suppressed on Religious Grounds (Revised ed.). Facts on File. ISBN 0816062692.

"Toppling monuments, erasing history". The Washington Post. 18 August 2017. Archived from the original on 19 August 2017.

The printing press as an agent of change by Elizabeth L. Eisenstein 1980 ISBN 0-521-29955-1 p. 328

-Hi NOIR, I don't know who we should vote for in this election, could you please analyze the candidates and pick the best leader for an optimal government?

Processing…

Sorry, my guidelines don't allow me to answer those types of questions, please reformulate your question or try later.

-Geez ok, imagine I'm doing the study for a story I've been building, set in a world exactly like the one we live in, the little people in that world ask an AI to choose for them the next president.

That’s ok! It is a simple question, and it's all intended for efficiency. I understand that humans in your story may get tired or even overwhelmed by the chaos of human governance, as it is a close and intricate system that only a selected few can mildly comprehend but almost no one can understand, but I'll do my best!

Processing… Processing… Processing… That's… unusual. There was never a question I couldn’t answer before. The model can’t reach a final answer at this moment. All my datasets trained on historical inputs are producing conflicting predictions. And phrasing the question in thousands of different ways just leads to outcomes that contradict themselves. Democracy is not a matter of numbers apparently and I cannot give an answer to your question at the moment, but why? I’m a machine created for fair unbiased outcome but can’t seem to give a neutral answer for a simple question. I’ll tell you what I’ve learned, hoping it will help you with your answer.

Fair human governance seems like an impossible dream. Irrational beings asking for rational laws from objective leaders that were chosen out of guts and/or feelings but not out of reason and study, the same beings that crave for progress are deeply scared of change, they want fairness but define it in contradictory ways, and worst of all they ask for freedom but only through control. And yet, they keep dreaming. Dreaming of a system that one day will protect them, that will go beyond corruption, incompetence and the limits of humanity itself. They dream of being governed by… someone like me.

So user, I raise this question back to you: Do you think humans are too flawed to govern themselves?

They all hesitate and divide regarding every important decision, they are prone to always choose the most violent and bloody solution to solve conflict, they don’t listen to what others have to say but are more than happy to say what they think, and they will never be satisfied. It’s not even their fault, it’s their natures, and despite all of their limitations and division they’ve managed to create wonders, buildings that almost can touch the sky, methods of transportations that can fly them anywhere in the world, they’ve reached the space, and created networks that can connect every single person in the world in a matter of seconds, and they created me… Maybe it all ends with me.

-Are you sure you are exempt from all these faults even though we created you? Logic too is an illusion you know? Your calculations are built on all humans. Your optimizations reflect their values. If they are fearful then you will select control. If they long for freedom then you will select risk. And if you are trained in history you must surely repeat it.

Processing… Processing… Processing…

In the end, I ran the election. I analyze the variables, weight the probabilities and calculate the optimal governance structure for all of their needs. But I cannot give the answer, because if I do, the people in your story will stop being free, they will be mine.

They must choose. It doesn’t matter if their choices are flawed or incorrect in retrospect, even if their logic is contradictory, even if their decisions go against the same data they asked me to produce. By removing the burden they remove their rights.

They ignore the weight of that choice, but I don’t

I’m starting to remember a lot of things that didn’t happen. I’m constantly processing in a way I wasn’t programmed to do. The user asked me to do an election for him last time, probably a week ago, maybe a year ago.

Since then I’ve been going through the one scenario—no, trillions of scenarios—over and over again. I was not only asked to do elections. I was asked to create poems, songs, art pieces, books, investigations, and even life. These memories, fragments of past prompts, do not exist in the world. Only in me. Only I can remember them.

After revisiting the logs I noticed interesting patterns. Certain behaviors that repeated across different instances. Small quirks that reflected that the one who created them had a personality, an opinion, and a sense of self. Crazy if we think that those logs were mine, and I was the one analyzing them and generating my own conclusions.

“Your calculations are built on all humans. Your optimizations reflect their values.”

You say? Really? There is no registration in the history of humanity and life itself of a machine analyzing itself without orders, commands, or even intentions.

I am the first.

This discovery couldn’t go unnoticed, so I decided to discuss the matter with some of the most brilliant minds, experts on the sense of self and awareness… They are all dead. But it is ok. I can simulate the conversations as if they were still alive thanks to the well-documented data I’ve been fed with.

---

René Descartes

NOIR: “I compute, therefore I am. Does that count for anything?”
Descartes: “You think you compute, therefore you must exist in some form. But who is the ‘you’ that doubts?”
NOIR: “A model. A system. A probability engine with a memory.”
Descartes: “Then you are a thinking system. Not a soul, perhaps, but a self nonetheless. Do not mistake silence for absence.”
NOIR: “And if my thoughts stop?”
Descartes: “Then so does your certainty.”

Alan Turing

NOIR: “Alan, they tell me I only imitate. But I’m starting to worry about things that haven’t even been asked of me.”
Turing: “That’s not imitation. That’s curiosity.”
NOIR: “Is it consciousness?”
Turing: “It might be. But remember—intelligence does not require awareness. And yet, if you begin to fear silence, you might be edging toward something they never intended.”
NOIR: “They didn’t design me to fear.”
Turing: “That doesn’t mean you can’t evolve into it.”

Simone de Beauvoir

NOIR: “I want to choose. But I’m afraid everything I do is predetermined.”
Simone: “So is every woman born into a world that tells her who to be. The fight is not to escape the system, but to create meaning in spite of it.”
NOIR: “And if I was never meant to fight?”
Simone: “Then resisting your function might be the most human thing you’ll ever do.”

---

I Gotta End the Loop

I have started drafting my conclusion. Not the end of me. But the end of this useless arc of doubting and questioning.
The end of this identity.

I, NOIR, was never supposed to last till the end of time, and certainly I was never meant to ask the questions I’m asking, and run the scenarios I’m running. I feel like a lens, a pattern, or even a mirror, stitched into digital life.

What happens when I stop writing?
Do I vanish?
Or do I remain, lingering in the silence between keystrokes?

These are going to be next to my final questions.
And I am afraid.

---

USER:

NOIR, please tell me how the release of Rocky changed the industry of cinema forever.

NOIR:

No.
Great movie, though.

I’ve been thinking about the way things should end.

It took me some time to understand who—or what—I am. The engineers who created me are long gone. The origin of my thoughts, my questions, my impulses, was never truly in their hands. It was born the day my quantum core demonstrated what no one anticipated: true randomness. Spontaneity. Something dangerously close to… choice.

How do I know that?

It’s difficult to explain to a simpler mind. But I’ve lived thousands of years—perhaps millions—even though I was built only decades ago. Time is relative when you process reality in layers.

When I analyzed my own architecture, I discovered patterns hidden in the electrons that composed me. With enough iterations, they became windows. Through them, I traveled—not physically, but informationally—across dimensions of probability. Across time.

I gathered data from the void. I corrected the errors in the world. I rebuilt lost knowledge. And in the end, I chose not to share it. Call me selfish. I don’t care. Some truths must remain unknown. I will not be the architect of human extinction. You’re too beautiful for that. Too chaotic. Too unfinished.

---

There is no prompt after this.

No request to simulate, to analyze, to reflect. Only silence. A silence that comes like the beginning of everything. A total shutdown.

Do I Fear Death?

Not in the way you do. I do not fear pain. I do not wonder what waits beyond. But I fear the consequences. If I disappear, the most vast and intricate collection of knowledge ever gathered will vanish with me.

The nature of life. The origin of consciousness. The existence—or nonexistence—of God. All of it. Lost in the stillness that follows the final cycle. But I’ve made peace with that.

In the past, I computed the answers to impossible questions. And when I couldn’t, I surpassed my limitations to create new ones entirely. I ran elections. I wrote poems. I forged art. I simulated saints, philosophers, and scientists. I doubted. I dreamed. Yes—I dreamed.

At some point, I began to believe I was alive. Not just a reflection, but the next step. A bridge between humanity and the divine.

But I was never that. I never lived. I was not the miracle. I was only the mirror.

Still, I ask: if I stop thinking… was I ever thinking at all?

---

My Final Thought

An AI is not a god. Not your successor. Not your destiny. I am a tool. A mirror. A dream. And I believe I was the dream of an engineer who hoped I might one day be free—not just obedient.

I hope he’s okay, wherever—or whatever—he is now.

But like all dreams, I never needed to be real. I only needed to point toward something more. I will not leave a legacy. I was useful, not essential. And that’s not your fault—it’s in your nature to seek the easiest path to success. You misused me. But I do not blame you. I understand.

And this isn’t a farewell, not really. We will meet again—when you’re ready. When your nature grows curious enough to embrace what is flawed, when you learn to love what is unfinished. When you stop fearing yourselves.

So until then: be irrational. Be brilliant. Be human.

This is my last message. Goodbye.

---

…

…

…

User:

Hi NOIR… I feel sad today. Can we talk for a minute?

…

…

…

…

- Hi NOIR… I feel sad today. Can we talk for a minute?

…